Now put them away.
There is no need for guys to have their arses hanging out either. No, don't pull your trousers up to your armpits, that isn't necessary, but at least have some sort of middle ground where your arse cheeks are not on show. Simple.
You think it looks all cool and gangster like? Do you know where it originates from?
From prison uniforms that didn't fit. Nope didn't have to do with sexual availability (there is a way of advertising that but I'm not going to divulge the prison code to you, you'll have to find that random shit out for yourself).
People in prison weren't allowed belts and so their trousers, which would be several sizes to big at times, would continuously fall down. YOU, however, are allowed a belt, so wear it. Use it. not to keep it up halfway down your legs, but to keep it at a decent height. Ktnx.
Thursday, 5 April 2012
Tuesday, 3 April 2012
Those are DEFINITELY not trousers...
And today I saw yet more people wearing leggings as trousers - the most creative look was somebody who was wearing a hoodie and had managed to roll up her leggings up to her knees. Why? not a clue.
For me, personally, I cannot understand that people want to walk around with every single little detail of their underwear and their 'private parts' - for lack of better words - on display.
I have seen many a person wearing leggings that are too tight for them and thus I could see the exact print of their underwear - not an attractive look.
Or you see every tiny bit that wobbles every time they take a step.
People PLEASE just wear clothes that cover you up, there is NO need to get your bum out in public. Ever. (Unless you're a burlesque dancer or a pole dancer or a striptease artist or any such thing, for that is your job.)
So let's move on - I do not have a problem with people wearing short skirts with leggings or tops that cover their arse, that what leggings are for - to wear with those sort of things. Not as trousers.
I would also like to add that jeggings that are actually just fabric with a denim print do NOT count as trousers either, they're still really thin. So no. Just no.
I think really that is all I have to say with this little rant - leggings are not trousers, so please don't wear them as if they are.
For me, personally, I cannot understand that people want to walk around with every single little detail of their underwear and their 'private parts' - for lack of better words - on display.
I have seen many a person wearing leggings that are too tight for them and thus I could see the exact print of their underwear - not an attractive look.
Or you see every tiny bit that wobbles every time they take a step.
People PLEASE just wear clothes that cover you up, there is NO need to get your bum out in public. Ever. (Unless you're a burlesque dancer or a pole dancer or a striptease artist or any such thing, for that is your job.)
So let's move on - I do not have a problem with people wearing short skirts with leggings or tops that cover their arse, that what leggings are for - to wear with those sort of things. Not as trousers.
I would also like to add that jeggings that are actually just fabric with a denim print do NOT count as trousers either, they're still really thin. So no. Just no.
I think really that is all I have to say with this little rant - leggings are not trousers, so please don't wear them as if they are.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)